[ Silicon Valley | Metroactive Home | Archives ]
Lies My President Told Me
As officials and journalists try to set the record straight, 10 whoppers the American public--and the world--was told about Iraq
By Christopher Scheer
THERE IS A small somber box that appears in The New York Times every day. Titled simply "Killed in Iraq," it lists the names and military affiliations of those who most recently died on tour of duty. The June 25 edition listed just one name: Orenthial J. Smith, age 21, of Allendale, S.C. As of presstime, the list of American military dead in Iraq was 217 names long.
The young, late O.J. Smith was almost certainly named after the legendary running back, Orenthal J. Simpson, before that dashing American hero was charged for a double murder. Now his namesake has died in far-off Mesopotamia in a noble mission to, as our president put it on March 19, "disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger."
Today, more than three months after Bush's stirring declaration of war and nearly two months since he declared victory, no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons have been found, or any documentation of their existence, or any sign they were deployed in the field.
The mainstream press, after an astonishing two years of underexamination, is belatedly drawing attention to what now appears to be an unconscionable level of administrative deception. They seem surprised to find that, when it comes to Iraq, the Bush administration isn't prone to the occasional lie of expediency or rushed deadline but, in fact, rode roughshod over the truth.
What follows are some of the most significant mistruths uttered by Bush and his top officials over the past year in what amounts to a systematic campaign to scare Americans into fighting a war they would not otherwise support:
Lie No. 1: "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons."--President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
Fact: This story, leaked to and breathlessly reported by Judith Miller in The New York Times, has turned out to be complete baloney. Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium. One intelligence analyst, who was part of the tubes investigation, angrily told the New Republic: "You had senior American officials like Condoleezza Rice saying the only use of this aluminum really is uranium centrifuges. She said that on television. And that's just a lie."
Lie No. 2: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."--President Bush, Jan. 28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.
Fact: This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect. The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out the story is pissed: "They knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie," he told the New Republic, anonymously. "They [the White House] were unpersuasive about aluminum tubes and added this to make their case more strongly."
Lie No. 3: "We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."--Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003, on Meet the Press.
Fact: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.
Lie No. 4: "[The CIA possesses] solid reporting of senior-level contacts between Iraq and Al Qaeda going back a decade."--CIA Director George Tenet in a written statement released Oct. 7, 2002, and echoed in that evening's speech by President Bush.
Fact: Intelligence agencies knew of tentative contacts between Saddam and Al Qaeda in the early '90s but found no proof of a continuing relationship. In other words, by tweaking language, Tenet and Bush spun the intelligence 180 degrees to say exactly the opposite of what it suggested.
Lie No. 5: "We've learned that Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and deadly gases. ... Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints."--President Bush, Oct. 7.
Fact: No evidence of this has ever been leaked or produced. Colin Powell told the U.N. that this alleged training took place in a camp in northern Iraq. To his great embarrassment, the area he indicated was later revealed to be outside Iraq's control and patrolled by Allied warplanes.
Lie No. 6: "We have also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] for missions targeting the United States."--President Bush, Oct. 7.
Fact: Said drones can't fly more than 300 miles, and Iraq is 6,000 miles from the U.S. coastline. Furthermore, Iraq's drone-building program wasn't much more advanced than your average model-plane enthusiast's. And isn't a "manned aerial vehicle" just a scary way to say "plane"?
Lie No. 7: "We have seen intelligence over many months that they have chemical and biological weapons, and that they have dispersed them and that they're weaponized and that, in one case at least, the command and control arrangements have been established."--President Bush, Feb. 8, 2003, in a national radio address.
Fact: Despite a massive nationwide search by U.S. and British forces, there are no signs, traces or examples of chemical weapons having been deployed in the field or anywhere else during the war.
Lie No. 8: "Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets."--Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5, 2003, in remarks to the U.N. Security Council.
Fact: Putting aside the glaring fact that not one drop of this massive stockpile has been found, as previously reported, the United States' own intelligence reports show that these stocks--if they existed--were well past their use-by date and therefore useless as weapon fodder.
Lie No. 9: "We know where [Iraq's WMDs] are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."--Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003, in statements to the press.
Fact: Needless to say, no such weapons were found, not to the east, west, south or north, somewhat or otherwise.
Lie No. 10: "Yes, we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the U.N. prohibited."--President Bush in remarks in Poland, published internationally June 1, 2003.
Fact: This was a reference to the discovery of two modified truck trailers that the CIA claimed were potential mobile biological weapons labs. But British and American experts--including the State Department's intelligence wing in a report released this week--have since declared this to be untrue. According to the British--and much to Prime Minister Tony Blair's embarrassment--the trailers are actually exactly what Iraq said they were: facilities to fill weather balloons, sold to them by the British themselves.
So, months after the war, we are once again where we started--with plenty of rhetoric and absolutely no proof of this "grave danger" for which O.J. Smith died. The Bush administration is now scrambling to place the blame for its lies on faulty intelligence, when in fact the intelligence was fine; it was the administration's abuse of it that was "faulty."
Rather than apologize for leading us to a pre-emptive war based on impossibly faulty or shamelessly distorted "intelligence" or offering his resignation, our president is starting to sound more like that other O.J. Like the man who cheerfully played golf while promising to pursue "the real killers," Bush is now vowing to search for "the true extent of Saddam Hussein's weapons programs, no matter how long it takes."
On the terrible day of the 9/11 attacks, five hours after a hijacked plane slammed into the Pentagon, retired Gen. Wesley Clark received a strange call from someone (he didn't name names) representing the White House position: "I was on CNN, and I got a call at my home saying, 'You got to say this is connected. This is state-sponsored terrorism. This has to be connected to Saddam Hussein,'" Clark told Meet the Press anchor Tim Russert. "I said, 'But--I'm willing to say it, but what's your evidence?' And I never got any evidence.'"
[ Silicon Valley | Metroactive Home | Archives ]
Copyright © Metro Publishing Inc. Metroactive is affiliated with the Boulevards Network.
For more information about the San Jose/Silicon Valley area, visit sanjose.com.
|
|